2011 Ford F-250 vs. 2004 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2011 Ford F-250 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Samsung SM3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Samsung SM3 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 291 more horse power than 2004 Samsung SM3. (94 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2004 Samsung SM3.
Because 2011 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Samsung SM3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-250 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 413 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Samsung SM3. (135 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2011 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Samsung SM3.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Ford F-250 | 2004 Samsung SM3 | |
Make | Ford | Samsung |
Model | F-250 | SM3 |
Year Released | 2011 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6200 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 385 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 548 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 6269 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2029 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1966 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3967 mm | 2540 mm |