2011 Ford F-250 vs. 2005 Rover 75
To start off, 2011 Ford F-250 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Rover 75 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 2005 Rover 75. (175 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2005 Rover 75.
Because 2011 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-250 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 308 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Rover 75. (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2011 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Ford F-250 | 2005 Rover 75 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | F-250 | 75 |
Year Released | 2011 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6200 cc | 2496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 385 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 548 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 6269 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2029 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1966 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3967 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 65 L |