2011 Ford F-250 vs. 2010 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2011 Ford F-250 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2010 Ford Falcon. (261 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-250 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Falcon. (391 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2011 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Ford F-250 | 2010 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | F-250 | Falcon |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6200 cc | 3983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 385 HP | 261 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 548 Nm | 391 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 6269 mm | 4967 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2029 mm | 1868 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1966 mm | 1433 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3967 mm | 2838 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 68 L |
