2011 Ford F-250 vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Ford F-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Ford F-250 would be higher. At 6,700 cc (12 cylinders), 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (453 HP @ 5350 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2011 Ford F-250. (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford F-250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Ford F-250. (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Ford F-250.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Ford F-250 | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | F-250 | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6200 cc | 6700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 385 HP | 453 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5350 RPM |
| Torque | 548 Nm | 720 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 6269 mm | 5612 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2029 mm | 1987 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1966 mm | 1566 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3967 mm | 3320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 80 L |
