2011 Ford F-350 vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2011 Ford F-350 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-350 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 355 more horse power than 1992 Mitsubishi Minica. (30 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1992 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 1992 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Ford F-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-350 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 505 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mitsubishi Minica. (43 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mitsubishi Minica.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Ford F-350 | 1992 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | F-350 | Minica |
Year Released | 2011 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6200 cc | 548 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 385 HP | 30 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 548 Nm | 43 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 6269 mm | 3200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2029 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1961 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3967 mm | 2270 mm |