2011 Ford F-450 vs. 1994 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2011 Ford F-450 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 6,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-450 (399 HP @ 2800 RPM) has 295 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (104 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Because 2011 Ford F-450 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Mazda Midge. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-450 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-450 (1,085 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 929 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (156 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2011 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Ford F-450 | 1994 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | F-450 | Midge |
| Year Released | 2011 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6700 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 399 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 2800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 1085 Nm | 156 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 6680 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2438 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2024 mm | 1400 mm |
