2011 Holden Calais vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Holden Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Holden Calais would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (335 HP) has 57 more horse power than 2011 Holden Calais. (278 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Calais.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Holden Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jaguar XF. (340 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jaguar XF.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Holden Calais | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Holden | Jaguar |
| Model | Calais | XF |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 278 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
