2011 Holden Commodore vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Holden Commodore is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 97 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2011 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Holden Commodore | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Holden | Ford |
Model | Commodore | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2011 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2564 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |