2011 Holden Commodore vs. 2013 Toyota Sequoia

To start off, 2013 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Sequoia (376 HP) has 16 more horse power than 2011 Holden Commodore. (360 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Commodore.

Because 2013 Toyota Sequoia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Sequoia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Sequoia (544 Nm) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2013 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Commodore. 2013 Toyota Sequoia has automatic transmission and 2011 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2011 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota Sequoia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: