2011 Holden Epica vs. 2003 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Honda CR-V (160 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2011 Holden Epica. (153 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Epica.
Because 2003 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Honda CR-V. (218 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Holden Epica | 2003 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Holden | Honda |
| Model | Epica | CR-V |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2492 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 160 HP |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4805 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
