2011 Honda CR-V vs. 2002 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-V is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Honda CR-V weights approximately 366 kg more than 2002 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2002 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Honda CR-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Honda CR-V | 2002 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Honda | Nissan |
| Model | CR-V | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2400 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1536 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4554 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1819 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1679 mm | 1450 mm |
