2011 Honda CR-V vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-V is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 2,351 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda CR-V (148 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2003 Mitsubishi Magna. (141 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 2003 Mitsubishi Magna.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mitsubishi Magna. (206 Nm). This means 2011 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mitsubishi Magna.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Honda CR-V | 2003 Mitsubishi Magna | |
| Make | Honda | Mitsubishi |
| Model | CR-V | Magna |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2351 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 141 HP |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4554 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1819 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1679 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2619 mm | 2730 mm |
