2011 Jaguar XF vs. 1982 Mazda 626
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Jaguar XF weights approximately 800 kg more than 1982 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Jaguar XF | 1982 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
| Model | XF | 626 |
| Year Released | 2011 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 385 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 1045 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4961 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1877 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1461 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2908 mm | 2520 mm |
