2011 Jaguar XF vs. 2006 BMW 630
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 630. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 630 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 630 (254 HP) has 17 more horse power than 2011 Jaguar XF. (237 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 630 should accelerate faster than 2011 Jaguar XF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 630. (300 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 630.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Jaguar XF | 2006 BMW 630 | |
Make | Jaguar | BMW |
Model | XF | 630 |
Year Released | 2011 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 237 HP | 254 HP |
Torque | 500 Nm | 300 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.7 seconds | 7.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4961 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1877 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1461 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2908 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.3 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |