2011 Jaguar XF vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Jaguar XF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Jaguar XF would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 116 more horse power than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (71 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Jaguar XF | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Jaguar | Smart |
| Model | XF | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 71 HP |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4961 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1877 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1461 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2908 mm | 1867 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 33 L |
