2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (187 HP) has 112 more horse power than 1981 Mitsubishi Sigma. (75 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1981 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Because 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mitsubishi Sigma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (320 Nm) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mitsubishi Sigma. (117 Nm). This means 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1981 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | Sigma |
| Year Released | 2011 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2987 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 75 HP |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 117 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4859 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1958 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1755 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2916 mm | 2520 mm |
