2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1983 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (187 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1983 Holden Commodore. (78 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1983 Holden Commodore.
Because 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (320 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Holden Commodore. (140 Nm). This means 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1983 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Jeep | Holden |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Commodore |
Year Released | 2011 | 1983 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 1891 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 78 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 140 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4859 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1958 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1755 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2916 mm | 2670 mm |