2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2006 BMW 523
To start off, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 523. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 523 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (290 HP) has 115 more horse power than 2006 BMW 523. (175 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 523.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (352 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 523. (230 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 523.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2006 BMW 523 | |
Make | Jeep | BMW |
Model | Grand Cherokee | 523 |
Year Released | 2011 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 175 HP |
Torque | 352 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4821 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1938 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1763 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2916 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 70 L |