2011 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP) has 108 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2011 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Jeep Wrangler | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Jeep | Ford |
| Model | Wrangler | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2003 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3800 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 94 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3881 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1872 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1826 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2423 mm | 2490 mm |
