2011 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2010 BMW 320
To start off, 2011 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 BMW 320 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2010 BMW 320. (182 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2010 BMW 320.
Because 2011 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 BMW 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW 320 (380 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Jeep Wrangler. (321 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Jeep Wrangler | 2010 BMW 320 | |
Make | Jeep | BMW |
Model | Wrangler | 320 |
Year Released | 2011 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3800 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 321 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4404 mm | 4624 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1877 mm | 1811 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2946 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 57 L |