2011 Kia Cadenza vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2011 Kia Cadenza is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Tundra (242 HP) has 41 more horse power than 2011 Kia Cadenza. (201 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2011 Kia Cadenza. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 375 kg more than 2011 Kia Cadenza. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Kia Cadenza. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Kia Cadenza | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Kia | Toyota |
| Model | Cadenza | Tundra |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2400 cc | 4663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 242 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4965 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1475 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2845 mm | 3270 mm |
