2011 Kia Cadenza vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Kia Cadenza is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Holden Epica would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Cadenza (269 HP) has 121 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Kia Cadenza | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Kia | Holden |
Model | Cadenza | Epica |
Year Released | 2011 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 269 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4965 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1475 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2845 mm | 2700 mm |