2011 Kia Cadenza vs. 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Kia Cadenza. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Kia Cadenza would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee (238 HP) has 37 more horse power than 2011 Kia Cadenza. (201 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2011 Kia Cadenza.
Because 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Kia Cadenza. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Kia Cadenza | 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Kia | Jeep |
| Model | Cadenza | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2400 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 238 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4965 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1958 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1475 mm | 1755 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2845 mm | 2916 mm |
