2011 Kia Optima vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Kia Optima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Kia Optima would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (420 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 254 more horse power than 2011 Kia Optima. (166 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2011 Kia Optima. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 168 kg more than 2011 Kia Optima. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (569 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 360 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Kia Optima. (209 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Kia Optima. 2011 Kia Optima has automatic transmission and 2013 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Kia Optima will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Kia Optima | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Kia | Chevrolet |
Model | Optima | Camaro |
Year Released | 2011 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2400 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 166 HP | 420 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 569 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1583 kg | 1751 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4844 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1831 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1455 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2797 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.9 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 6.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 72 L |