2011 Kia Rondo vs. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Kia Rondo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Kia Rondo would be higher. At 5,935 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage weights approximately 345 kg more than 2011 Kia Rondo.
Because 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Aston Martin Vantage. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Kia Rondo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage (469 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Kia Rondo. (250 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Aston Martin Vantage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Kia Rondo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Kia Rondo | 2013 Aston Martin Vantage | |
| Make | Kia | Aston Martin |
| Model | Rondo | Vantage |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2656 cc | 5935 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 198 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7300 RPM |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 469 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4382 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.2 L/100km | 10.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 16.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 80 L |
