2011 Koenigsegg Agera vs. 2002 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2011 Koenigsegg Agera is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Koenigsegg Agera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Koenigsegg Agera (1,100 HP) has 946 more horse power than 2002 Honda CR-V. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Koenigsegg Agera should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Honda CR-V weights approximately 210 kg more than 2011 Koenigsegg Agera.
Because 2002 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Koenigsegg Agera. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Koenigsegg Agera | 2002 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Koenigsegg | Honda |
| Model | Agera | CR-V |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 1100 HP | 154 HP |
| Fuel Type | Biofuel | Gasoline - Premium |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 2.9 seconds | 10.1 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4293 mm | 4570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1996 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2630 mm |
