2011 Koenigsegg Agera vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Koenigsegg Agera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Koenigsegg Agera would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Koenigsegg Agera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Koenigsegg Agera (1,100 HP) has 944 more horse power than 2013 Toyota Matrix. (156 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Koenigsegg Agera should accelerate faster than 2013 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 190 kg more than 2011 Koenigsegg Agera.
Because 2011 Koenigsegg Agera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Koenigsegg Agera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Koenigsegg Agera | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Koenigsegg | Toyota |
Model | Agera | Matrix |
Year Released | 2011 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 1100 HP | 156 HP |
Fuel Type | Biofuel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4293 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1996 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2600 mm |