2011 Lexus HS vs. 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Lexus HS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Lexus HS would be higher. Both 2011 Lexus HS and 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer are equipped with a 2,400 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Lexus HS (187 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Lexus HS should accelerate faster than 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Lexus HS weights approximately 345 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Lexus HS | 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Lexus | Mitsubishi |
Model | HS | Lancer |
Year Released | 2011 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2400 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | CVT | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1365 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4694 mm | 4572 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1786 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1506 mm | 1491 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.9 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 6.7 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 59 L |