2011 Mazda 3 vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 2. (95 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda 3 (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 2. (205 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Mazda 3 | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 3 | 2 |
Year Released | 2011 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2184 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 205 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | 5-speed manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1755 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1471 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2639 mm | 2489 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 43 L |