2011 Mazda 6 vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2011 Mazda 6 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda 6 weights approximately 662 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Mazda 6 | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | 6 | 66 |
| Year Released | 2011 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | 5-speed automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1484 kg | 822 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1839 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1471 mm | 1390 mm |
