2011 Mazda 6 vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 2011 Mazda 6 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 6 (170 HP) has 71 more horse power than 1986 Ford Aerostar. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda 6 weights approximately 74 kg more than 1986 Ford Aerostar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Mazda 6 | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 6 | Aerostar |
Year Released | 2011 | 1986 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 99 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1484 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1839 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1471 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2789 mm | 3030 mm |