2011 Mazda 6 vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, both 2011 Mazda 6 and 2011 Jaguar XF were released in the same year (2011). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 67 more horse power than 2011 Mazda 6. (170 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda 6.
Because 2011 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda 6. (226 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Mazda 6 | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Mazda | Jaguar |
Model | 6 | XF |
Year Released | 2011 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 226 Nm | 500 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1839 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1471 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2789 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |