2011 Mazda BT-50 vs. 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,064 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 910 more horse power than 2011 Mazda BT-50. (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda BT-50.
Because 2011 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,060 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 680 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda BT-50. (380 Nm @ 180 RPM). This means 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda BT-50.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Mazda BT-50 | 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
Make | Mazda | Koenigsegg |
Model | BT-50 | CCXR |
Year Released | 2011 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2953 cc | 4719 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 1064 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 1060 Nm |
Torque RPM | 180 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2660 mm |