2011 Mazda BT-50 vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Nissan Pixo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Nissan Pixo would be higher. At 2,604 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda BT-50 (123 HP) has 55 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2011 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Nissan Pixo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Mazda BT-50 | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | BT-50 | Pixo |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2604 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2360 mm |
