2011 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2013 Volvo C70
To start off, 2013 Volvo C70 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Mazda CX-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Mazda CX-9 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2013 Volvo C70. (224 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2013 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 213 kg more than 2013 Volvo C70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo C70. (236 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Mazda CX-9 | 2013 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | CX-9 | C70 |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 5 valves |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 224 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 366 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1964 kg | 1751 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5085 mm | 4615 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1935 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1727 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2875 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
