2011 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2012 BMW X5
To start off, 2012 BMW X5 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 BMW X5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 BMW X5 has automatic transmission and 2011 Mazda RX-8 has manual transmission. 2011 Mazda RX-8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 BMW X5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Mazda RX-8 | 2012 BMW X5 | |
| Make | Mazda | BMW |
| Model | RX-8 | X5 |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1300 cc | 4400 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 232 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 7-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4851 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1994 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1341 mm | 1763 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2703 mm | 2933 mm |
