2011 Mini Cooper Clubman vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Mini Cooper Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Mini Cooper Clubman would be higher. Both 2011 Mini Cooper Clubman and 2012 Volvo C30 are equipped with a 1,600 cc engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 166 kg more than 2011 Mini Cooper Clubman.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Mini Cooper Clubman | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Mini | Volvo |
| Model | Cooper Clubman | C30 |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1600 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 181 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1684 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1433 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2548 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 6.7 L/100km | 3.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |
