2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV vs. 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero weights approximately 460 kg more than 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Because 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi |
Model | i-MiEV | Pajero |
Year Released | 2011 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
Fuel Type | Electric | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Single Speed | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3395 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1475 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2790 mm |