2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV vs. 2012 Nissan NP300
To start off, 2012 Nissan NP300 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV would be higher.
Because 2012 Nissan NP300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan NP300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | 2012 Nissan NP300 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
Model | i-MiEV | NP300 |
Year Released | 2011 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 131 HP |
Fuel Type | Electric | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Single Speed | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3395 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1475 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2960 mm |