2011 Nissan Leaf vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Nissan Leaf. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Nissan Leaf would be higher.
Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Nissan Leaf. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Nissan Leaf | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Nissan | Jaguar |
| Model | Leaf | XJ |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | electric | W |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 380 HP |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Single Speed | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4445 mm | 5252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2105 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1549 mm | 1456 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3157 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 2.6 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 2.2 L/100km | 11.7 L/100km |
