2011 Nissan Micra vs. 1965 BMW 3200 CS
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 BMW 3200 CS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 BMW 3200 CS would be higher. At 3,169 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 BMW 3200 CS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 BMW 3200 CS (160 HP) has 81 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1965 BMW 3200 CS should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Because 1965 BMW 3200 CS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 BMW 3200 CS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 BMW 3200 CS (240 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1965 BMW 3200 CS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Nissan Micra | 1965 BMW 3200 CS | |
Make | Nissan | BMW |
Model | Micra | 3200 CS |
Year Released | 2011 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 3169 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 160 HP |
Torque | 108 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1666 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1514 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2449 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 75 L |