2011 Nissan Micra vs. 2012 Volvo C70
To start off, 2012 Volvo C70 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Nissan Micra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Nissan Micra would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C70 (350 Nm) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra. 2012 Volvo C70 has automatic transmission and 2011 Nissan Micra has manual transmission. 2011 Nissan Micra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo C70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Nissan Micra | 2012 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Micra | C70 |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 108 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4582 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1666 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1514 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2449 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 60 L |
