2011 Nissan Navara vs. 2012 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pixo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Nissan Navara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Nissan Navara would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Navara is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2011 Nissan Navara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Nissan Pixo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Navara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Nissan Navara | 2012 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Nissan | Nissan |
| Model | Navara | Pixo |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.3 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2360 mm |
