2011 Peugeot 408 vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2011 Peugeot 408 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP) has 36 more horse power than 2011 Peugeot 408. (143 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2011 Peugeot 408.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot 408, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Peugeot 408. (240 Nm). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Peugeot 408.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Peugeot 408 | 2003 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Peugeot | Cadillac |
| Model | 408 | CTS |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1560 cc | 2597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 179 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1815 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1525 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2890 mm |
