2011 Peugeot RCZ vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Peugeot RCZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Peugeot RCZ would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (286 HP) has 123 more horse power than 2011 Peugeot RCZ. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2011 Peugeot RCZ.
Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Peugeot RCZ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 2011 Peugeot RCZ has manual transmission. 2011 Peugeot RCZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Peugeot RCZ | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Peugeot | Jeep |
Model | RCZ | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2011 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 286 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4287 mm | 4821 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1845 mm | 2154 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1359 mm | 1763 mm |