2011 Renault Fluence vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2011 Renault Fluence is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (113 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2011 Renault Fluence. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Fluence.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Renault Fluence | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Renault | Mazda |
Model | Fluence | 3 |
Year Released | 2011 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1500 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 113 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4618 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1809 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1478 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2702 mm | 2639 mm |