2011 Saab 03-Sep vs. 1963 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 2011 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Saab 03-Sep (210 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1963 Ford Zodiac. (108 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Zodiac.
Because 2011 Saab 03-Sep is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Zodiac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Saab 03-Sep will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Saab 03-Sep (299 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Zodiac. (191 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2011 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Saab 03-Sep | 1963 Ford Zodiac | |
Make | Saab | Ford |
Model | 03-Sep | Zodiac |
Year Released | 2011 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 299 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | AWD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4689 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1801 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1529 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2675 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 45 L |