2011 Saab 03-Sep vs. 2002 Ford F-150
To start off, 2011 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Saab 03-Sep (210 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2002 Ford F-150. (202 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford F-150.
Because 2002 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Saab 03-Sep. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford F-150 (339 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Saab 03-Sep. (299 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Saab 03-Sep.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Saab 03-Sep | 2002 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Saab | Ford |
Model | 03-Sep | F-150 |
Year Released | 2011 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 299 Nm | 339 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4646 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1781 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1438 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2675 mm | 3050 mm |