2011 Saab 03-Sep vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Saab 03-Sep. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Saab 03-Sep would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (281 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2011 Saab 03-Sep. (180 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2011 Saab 03-Sep.
Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Saab 03-Sep. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Saab 03-Sep (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jeep Wrangler. (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2011 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Saab 03-Sep | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Saab | Jeep |
Model | 03-Sep | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2011 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.4 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 70 L |