2011 SsangYong Korando vs. 2003 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2011 SsangYong Korando is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 SsangYong Korando (175 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2003 Honda CR-V. (160 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2011 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda CR-V.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 2011 SsangYong Korando has manual transmission. 2011 SsangYong Korando will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 SsangYong Korando | 2003 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | SsangYong | Honda |
| Model | Korando | CR-V |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2003 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2360 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 160 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4540 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
